Description of Display Concern:

1. (image 1, just contact us page (no number)) Tag line per branding is: We choose sides. Yours. This is incorrectly displayed on page as: We choose sides – Yours!

2. (image 2) Like the simplicity of this section, but the font for “follow us on social” and “leave us a review” is larger then the heading above it “Read our blog posts…” can these be the same size please? 3. (Refer to image 1) There is clearly multiple types of fonts on this page. “Contact us” in the header image needs to match font of the rest of the page, font in the form needs to match as well. We need to pick a font for the site and stick with it. What is the font for the site?

4. (image 3) might just because this is a staging sight, but got an error testing the form

5. (image 4) Newsletter submission font color is white on white background, needs to be changed to black font on the white background so the user can see it.

6. (image 5) words “divorce” and “child custody” are not clickable in footer, both should be linked to appropriate pages

from other email change outside of excel document: contact us page – I kind of miss the old team pic there… and the transition from the top banner to the image for the consultation form is not working it just looks off, maybe image behind the consult form just needs to be removed. I know it was on original site, but with the change of top banner and removal of the middle thing that separated the sections it just looks off

Goal/Reason for change:

• 1. Get the trademarked line correct: We choose sides. Yours.
• 2. goes from large text to smaller text to large text headings, want it all to make sense maybe larger to smaller for headings as it moves down the page.
• 3. Font should be consistent throughout page
• 4. will the form be working correctly when live? make note to test after live.
• 5. Need text to show on newsletter submission, user can’t see what they are typing
• 6. divorce and child custody in footer should link to appropriate pages
• 7. kind of miss the team picture being on the contact us page at the top…

RESPONSES COMPLETION & QUESTIONS

• 1 – Corrected & Done
  
• 2 – I have definitely addressed this per your concern on this page in specific but this is also a design a problem site wide that will eventually need to be addressed in full but is out of scope for this process in technical seo that we’ve done. I could spend an entire additional 2 to three weeks fixing every issue of this type.
  
• 3 – Some of this is intentional (see image 1 below). Some of this is displaying in error due to prompt removal of some style assets that were blocking page load times …. when i improved how the html loads during of the removal of assets of this process occurred in the technical seo stage sometimes things got a lil wonky and i have gone around fixing most of them ….
  
  This is why we may be seeing some fonts mix in areas but the concept in general of mixing font styles specifically using a serif font and a paired non-serif font in general is a long time honored design principal that i have always followed. Ultimately if you disagree with this principal its what ever im not married to any decision i make ultimately its yalls brand lol but my default has been to always follow this principal of design i learned in school.
  
  (to explain in specific the really geeky design rule i learned in school) “There are defined serifs to use for overall page headers, a defined sans-serif to use for the content body area mixed with a specific serif to use in headlines within the content areas.”
  
  This becomes a lil more apparent on pages like employment & team pages that have a bit more of defined style for the attributes of data defined on the page. Alot of whats explained here has alot to do with why and from what aspect the pages in my humble opinion need a redesign. There isn’t really a brand defined page style overall of how headlines area treated theres only a font size difference and additionally, because of all of the previous awkwardness of using the tinymce page editor mixing the step of content and presentation, the tinymce editor vs gutenberg will end up adding extra empty P tags that add awkward spaces to all the content areas that it outputs…
  
  the above as explained & addressing the layout for a defined brand style mean that each and every page has to be gone thru one by one and addressed for errors in display on a sentence by sentence basis so that not only do things display correctly without errors but they represent the brand properly going forward.
  
  This level of detail to the content is not at all what was done in our web development redesign of this project. Details of much less granular specificity is what was dealt with in order to get the site to state that it is now.
  
  This was a technical seo project with some redesign aspects supporting it. A Design heavy project would indeed benefit the brand.
  
• 4 – The quick answer is “as intended forms don’t work on staging”
  the forms per configuration intent forms do not work on staging due to the live url denverdivorceattorneys.com being the only one configured to send form results via email. Additional steps could be taken if you wish to add urls other than the live domain to mailgun but in my opinion as long as the form hasn’t changed testing forms from a staging url is a whole process that becomes too much for this step. none of the form inner workings have at all changed in this step and when brought to the live domain should you wish we can definitely complete a forms test that i know 100% will be working because its on the live domain and not the staging url…
  
• 5 – Removed newsletter submission from contact page, focus lost to have two forms on one page. Pages should have one funnel to completion, should there be a call to action, not multiple.
• 6 – Corrected & Done
  
• 7 – Corrected & Done

This excerpt came from the url: https://webflow.com/blog/font-pairing#:~:text=When%20using%20a%20serif%2C%20always,both%20body%20copy%20and%20headers.